<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>_mindMeld &#187; Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/category/java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog</link>
	<description>Les Stroud on Technology, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:10:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gosling at Google, what if?</title>
		<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2011/04/01/gosling-at-google-what-if/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2011/04/01/gosling-at-google-what-if/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Les Stroud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2011/04/01/gosling-at-google-what-if/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">So, Google got <a href="http://nighthacks.com/roller/jag/entry/next_step_on_the_road#comments">Gosling</a>. Old news at this point, I know. I was wondering, though, if Google is doing this as part of a bigger plan. Granted, google is not as strategic as Apple, but they are seldom without intent. So, I thought I throw out some completely basis conjecture (the media does, why can&#8217;t I <img src='http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ). </p>
<p style="clear: both"><em>Disclaimer: There are no facts after this point. It is all what if scenario / made up / completely unfounded speculation.</em></p>
<p style="clear: both">What ifs&#8230;<br />What if google had a significant investment in Java, but no license for it?<br />What if google knew that Java was an important differentiator for themselves?<br />What if google wanted to grow the Java community to their benefit?<br />What if google had the biggest names in the Java ecosystem (Gosling, Bloch, Bray, Haase, Russell, Norbye,&#8230;)?<br />What if google realized that Java was open source (GPL)?<br />What if google forked Java and called it something else (Gava)?<br />Would the Java community follow? </p>
<p style="clear: both">Oracle owns the rights to the Java brand and the Java TCK (certification). Java&#8217;s standards have been the driving force behind holding the community together. There is enormous power in the Java standards from an adoption perspective (think John Nash). Compatibility has been the hallmark of Java&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2011/04/01/gosling-at-google-what-if/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Javazone Trailer &#8211; Very Funny Java Video</title>
		<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/25/javazone-trailer-very-funny-java-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/25/javazone-trailer-very-funny-java-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Les Stroud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/25/javazone-trailer-very-funny-java-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">This is hysterical. Gotta imagine this will be viral in the development world.</p><p style="clear: both"><span style=" display: inline; float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0;"><object height="223" width="380"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KrfpnbGXL70&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;hd=1&#038;border=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KrfpnbGXL70&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;hd=1&#038;border=1" allowscriptaccess="always" height="223" width="380"></embed></object></span></p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/25/javazone-trailer-very-funny-java-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sun has Risen, and it&#8217;s Name is Google</title>
		<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/09/the-sun-has-risen-and-its-name-is-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/09/the-sun-has-risen-and-its-name-is-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Les Stroud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">Excuse my hyperbole, but I can&#8217;t help but notice the amazing resemblance of today&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google">Google</a> to yesterday&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Microsystems">Sun Microsystems</a>. </p>
<p style="clear: both">I cut my teeth as a Java programmer from the earliest days of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_(programming_language)">Java</a> (pre 1.0). So, I followed Sun quite closely through the years. As I watched the Google I/O keynotes, I was struck by how much <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vic_Gundotra">Vic Gundotra</a> sounded like a cross between <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gage">John Gage</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_McNealy">Scott McNealy</a>. </p>
<p style="clear: both">Sun, used to make a habit out of <a href="http://tv.sys-con.com/node/44347">cracking one liners</a> about Microsoft. Google has done the same with Apple. </p>
<blockquote style="clear: both"><p><strong>&#8220;Sun Is Not Proprietary, Just As IBM Is Not Bankrupt&#8221;</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="clear: both">Replace IBM with Apple and Sun with Google&#8230;sound familiar?</p>
<p style="clear: both">As a I think about it, the comparison does not stop there. Sun stumbled into a fantastic market that was out of it&#8217;s core competency. They decided to use their cash cow, hardware, to fund this new business. Google has entered into the phone business. There is money to be made their, but the development and support efforts are largely funded by search revenue. Sound similar?</p>
<p style="clear: both">If you look back in history, Sun released and managed Java as free software (yes it was not open til later). For years, they funded that effort with their hardware business. Eventually, they were&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/09/the-sun-has-risen-and-its-name-is-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome 5 vs. Safari 5 Rendering Speeds, Shouldn&#8217;t they be the Same?</title>
		<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/09/chrome-5-vs-safari-5-rendering-speeds-shouldnt-they-be-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/09/chrome-5-vs-safari-5-rendering-speeds-shouldnt-they-be-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Les Stroud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/09/chrome-5-vs-safari-5-rendering-speeds-shouldnt-they-be-the-same/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">All the benchmarks clearly show that Chrome outperforms Safari 5. This makes sense that Chrome&#8217;s V8 may be faster for javascript, but if they are both using webkit, why is Safari so much slower on rendering and layout? Is Safari not pulling in the latest webkit? Or, has Google tweaked webkit in some way and not yet contributed that back to the project?</p>
<p style="clear: both">Anyone know?</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/09/chrome-5-vs-safari-5-rendering-speeds-shouldnt-they-be-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safari 5 vs Chrome 5 (Mac)</title>
		<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/08/safari-5-vs-chrome-5-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/08/safari-5-vs-chrome-5-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Les Stroud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/08/safari-5-vs-chrome-5-mac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">Here are the results of my initial speed test for Safari 5 vs Chrome 5. </p>
<p style="clear: both">There is nothing revolutionary here. Chrome is clearly faster on my macbook pro (i7, ssd hd). The only area where Safari 5 outperformed was in DOM manipulation&#8230;which is interesting. This should make it handle some in-application processing faster. Unfortunately, it may not be noticeable because Chrome will do the initial layout and the data processing much faster.</p>
<p style="clear: both"><a href="http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen_shot_2010-06-08_at_10.21.03_AM.png" class="image-link"><img class="linked-to-original" src="http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen_shot_2010-06-08_at_10-thumb.21.03_AM.png" height="138" align="left" width="380" style=" display: inline; float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0;" /></a></p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/06/08/safari-5-vs-chrome-5-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Awesome Embedded Java Device</title>
		<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/03/30/awesome-embedded-java-device/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/03/30/awesome-embedded-java-device/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Les Stroud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/03/30/awesome-embedded-java-device/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote style="clear: both"><p>Embedded systems are becoming ever more powerful and affordable. Check out the GuruPlug, which is scheduled for release in a couple of weeks and has amazing specs: Linux 2.6 1.2 GHz ARM processor with 512 MB DRAM 512 MB Flash, Ethernet, WiFi, 2 x USB, Bluetooth, GPIO Low power consumption and small footprint Java and OSGi available from distributor Retail price: US $99 (standard version)</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="clear: both">link: <a href="http://terrencebarr.wordpress.com/2010/03/30/the-guruplug-and-more-an-embedded-java-update/" target="_blank">The GuruPlug and more: An Embedded Java Update « Across the Universe</a>  </p>
<p style="clear: both">Man, this is in the price range to make playing with it fun!</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/03/30/awesome-embedded-java-device/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Code Bubbles, an Interesting New Idea in Coding</title>
		<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/03/14/code-bubbles-an-interesting-new-idea-in-coding-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/03/14/code-bubbles-an-interesting-new-idea-in-coding-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Les Stroud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/03/14/code-bubbles-an-interesting-new-idea-in-coding-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">Code Bubbles is an evolutionary idea which combines tools like Quartz Composer/Yahoo Pipes and traditional IDEs. It need polish, but this is an interesting idea. It seems to help provide some visual reference to make it simpler to understand the relationships in software. It seems like it combines MDA notions with code notions. Check out the video below. What do you think about it?</p><p style="clear: both"></p><p style="clear: both"><span style=" display: inline; float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0;"><object height="364" width="445"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PsPX0nElJ0k&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PsPX0nElJ0k&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="364" width="445"></embed></object></span><br style="clear: both" />
</p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/03/14/code-bubbles-an-interesting-new-idea-in-coding-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QT Making a Run at Swing Developers</title>
		<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/19/qt-making-a-run-at-swing-developers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/19/qt-making-a-run-at-swing-developers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Les Stroud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaFX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/19/qt-making-a-run-at-swing-developers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both"><a href="http://www.taranfx.com/best-cross-platform-gui">Qt: Best Cross-Platform GUI Applications</a><u><br /></u></p>
<p style="clear: both">Looks like QT is trying to answer the uncertainty that JavaFX has created for Swing programmers. Specifically, JavaFX is out there and has been named the air apparent to swing. However, JavaFX does not have a full component suite yet (table&#8230;cmon guys). So, with people knowing they will need to switch, but having some uncertainty about that switch, folks are a little lost. QT, looks like they are trying to position themselves as a good traditional gui toolkit that can be a refuge for swing programmers that don&#8217;t want to move to JavaFX.</p>
<p style="clear: both">Fun and Games</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/19/qt-making-a-run-at-swing-developers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java to VB in 11 years?</title>
		<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/08/java-to-vb-in-11-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/08/java-to-vb-in-11-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Les Stroud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/08/java-to-vb-in-11-years/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">Tiobe published their latest language survey today.<br style="text-decoration: underline;" /><a href="http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html">TIOBE Software: Tiobe Index</a><u><br /></u></p>
<p style="clear: both"><a href="http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tpci_trends1.png" class="image-link"><img class="linked-to-original" src="http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tpci_trends1-thumb.png" height="285" align="left" width="380" style=" display: inline; float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0;" /></a><br style="clear: both" />It&#8217;s been a while since I looked at it in any depth. However, this time I took the time to look at the trends. Using a simple linear interpolation, it looks as if Java will reach VB&#8217;s current level of irrelevance in about 11 years. </p>
<p style="clear: both">Now, VB is not irrelevant, it is still widely used for a large number of purposes. However, it is widely considered to be a dated or legacy language. If you accept that, and oracle does not radically alter the trend, Java will be in the same place in about 2020. </p>
<p style="clear: both">What is more interesting, is that there is not a clear heir apparent. There are several dynamic languages (including php &#8212; is that a language or a toolkit?), that have a positive slope. However, none seem to be approaching a breakout that would offset the losses that Java, C, and C++ are having. (I wonder if that represents a diversification among languages or a flaw in the survey.) Anyway, I think it is interesting to look at the trends from a career perspective. It appears that we are in store for a language trend change in&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/08/java-to-vb-in-11-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Adobe JavaFX Conspiracy Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/05/apple-adobe-javafx-conspiracy-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/05/apple-adobe-javafx-conspiracy-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Les Stroud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaFX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/05/apple-adobe-javafx-conspiracy-theory/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">I recently ran across <a href="http://www.hardmac.com/news/2010/02/05/apple-and-adobe-the-roots-and-reasons-behind-today-s-situation">this</a> article discussing the burgeoning war of the roses between Apple and Adobe.</p>
<blockquote style="clear: both"><p>The recent comments from Steve Jobs regarding Adobe might well be the first sign of a &#8220;cold war&#8221; between the two companies. Apple would be already preparing and developing applications to compete directly with Adobe&#8217;s solutions, leading to open warfare. Cupertino would also be developing a software that could compete with Flash and Dreamweaver, entirely based on HTML 5.0. Beside Aperture X which should be released soon, Apple might also be working to develop a solution similar to Photoshop, a high-end Pro-oriented solution. We do not know further details about those applications being developed as it is either hidden from view or just starting.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="clear: both">link: <a href="http://www.hardmac.com/news/2010/02/05/apple-and-adobe-the-roots-and-reasons-behind-today-s-situation">Hardmac.com : Le &#8220;Macbidouille&#8221; in English &#8211; Apple and Adobe: The Roots and Reasons Behind Today&#8217;s Situation</a><u><br /></u></p>
<p style="clear: both">The article goes into great depth about the souring relationship between the two companies and how that has taken place over time. I found myself wondering if that is what happened to Java on the Mac. At one point, Steve embraced Java. He proclaimed that it was going to be a center piece of Apple&#8217;s strategy. Given the lack of client side focus (at the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mindmeld.ws/blog/2010/02/05/apple-adobe-javafx-conspiracy-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

