The ‘+’ that matters is that Google’s ‘+’ is web/http and Apple’s ‘+’ is objective c talking over some protocol that is inaccessible outside of Apple’s world. Yes, the user interface matters (a lot), but that is not the key differentiator. Over time, native and web will unify from a user experience perspective (of course standards will always lag innovation, but that is another story).

Traditionally, the term cloud has been associated with the web. Most large cloud implementations are all about the web and web protocols. Amazon (both books and AWS), Google, Flickr, etc all implemented their cloud services using open accessible web standards. They embraced and leveraged the spirit of the web by utilizing well known http protocols along with simple textual APIs. Call it the semantic web, web services, or web 2.0. In the end, it is about the ability of developers (with a wide skill gap) to mash together data and functional services to create completely new and interesting software. Think of it as the world wide middleware. The linkage between web 2.0 and these cloud based services…

Disclaimer: There are no facts after this point. It is all what if scenario / made up / completely unfounded speculation.

What ifs…
What if google had a significant investment in Java, but no license for it?
What if google knew that Java was an important differentiator for themselves?
What if google wanted to grow the Java community to their benefit?
What if google had the biggest names in the Java ecosystem (Gosling, Bloch, Bray, Haase, Russell, Norbye,…)?
What if google realized that Java was open source (GPL)?
What if google forked Java and called it something else (Gava)?
Would the Java community follow?

Oracle owns the rights to the Java brand and the Java TCK (certification). Java’s standards have been the driving force behind holding the community together. There is enormous power in the Java standards from an adoption perspective (think John Nash). Compatibility has been the hallmark of Java…

It only weighs 20lbs.

There are 2 million miles of paved roads in the United States. Each of those miles has to be resurfaced periodically and the material generally used to pave roads is asphalt which is a petroleum product. So not only do you need to put gas in your family car, but the road you drive on also contributes to this country’s thirst for fossil fuels. But, what if that same road could instead be part of the production of green energy using solar panels. That wonderfully crazy idea is the brainchild of Scott Brusaw who is the CEO of Solar Roadways.

link: Solar Roads: The New Energy/Transport Convergence Device? | GeekBeat.TV

If they can solve the friction coefficient in differing conditions (ice on glass sounds really bad) then this may be a really good idea (something like this would actually be a decent idea for stimulus - as opposed to getting monkey's high).

If you haven't kept up with the advances in robotics, this video shows just how far it has come. Keep in mind, these robots are flying autonomously (no pilot, no remote control).

I cut my teeth as a Java programmer from the earliest days of Java (pre 1.0). So, I followed Sun quite closely through the years. As I watched the Google I/O keynotes, I was struck by how much Vic Gundotra sounded like a cross between John Gage and Scott McNealy.

Sun, used to make a habit out of cracking one liners about Microsoft. Google has done the same with Apple.

“Sun Is Not Proprietary, Just As IBM Is Not Bankrupt”

Replace IBM with Apple and Sun with Google…sound familiar?

As a I think about it, the comparison does not stop there. Sun stumbled into a fantastic market that was out of it’s core competency. They decided to use their cash cow, hardware, to fund this new business. Google has entered into the phone business. There is money to be made their, but the development and support efforts are largely funded by search revenue. Sound similar?

If you look back in history, Sun released and managed Java as free software (yes it was not open til later). For years, they funded that effort with their hardware business. Eventually, they were…

Anyone know?

There is nothing revolutionary here. Chrome is clearly faster on my macbook pro (i7, ssd hd). The only area where Safari 5 outperformed was in DOM manipulation…which is interesting. This should make it handle some in-application processing faster. Unfortunately, it may not be noticeable because Chrome will do the initial layout and the data processing much faster.

Greenpeace also links Apple’s decision to locate a huge cloud data center in North Carolina to that state’s cheap electricity supplies, which come mainly from coal-fired plants. Other companies, including Google, also run big data center operations in the Carolinas.

link: Rough Type: Nicholas Carr’s Blog: Greenpeace raids the cloud

This is another example of media games (or misstatements). While it is true that these facilities are in NC and it is true that most of NC’s power comes from coal, it is not true that these particular facilities are powered by coal. In fact, the specific facilities that he is referring to were intentionally located near Nuclear power plants. This is the CLEANEST and cheapest energy available.

Propagating that falsehood is another example of the modern media’s tendency to avoid fact checking or exaggerate in order to make a point. The bad thing is that the thousands of people that read that report or his blog that do not live in NC will never know that the…